[Buildroot] [PATCH v2 1/3] arch/Config.in.riscv: update instruction set ext
Thomas Petazzoni
thomas.petazzoni at bootlin.com
Thu Aug 17 07:40:15 UTC 2023
On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 17:04:42 +0200
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998 at free.fr> wrote:
> Basically, I think what Thomas expects is something like:
>
> diff --git a/arch/Config.in.riscv b/arch/Config.in.riscv
> index 3dfbb4165f..997f7a631d 100644
> --- a/arch/Config.in.riscv
> +++ b/arch/Config.in.riscv
> @@ -1,26 +1,5 @@
> # RISC-V CPU ISA extensions.
>
> -config BR2_RISCV_ISA_RVI
> - bool
> -
> -config BR2_RISCV_ISA_RVM
> - bool
> -
> -config BR2_RISCV_ISA_RVA
> - bool
> -
> -config BR2_RISCV_ISA_RVF
> - bool
> -
> -config BR2_RISCV_ISA_RVD
> - bool
> -
> -config BR2_RISCV_ISA_RVC
> - bool
> -
> -config BR2_RISCV_ISA_RVV
> - bool
> -
> choice
> prompt "Target Architecture Variant"
> default BR2_riscv_g
> @@ -41,38 +20,28 @@ config BR2_riscv_custom
>
> endchoice
>
> -if BR2_riscv_custom
> -
> comment "Instruction Set Extensions"
>
> -config BR2_RISCV_ISA_CUSTOM_RVM
> +config BR2_RISCV_ISA_RVM
> bool "Integer Multiplication and Division (M)"
> - select BR2_RISCV_ISA_RVM
>
> -config BR2_RISCV_ISA_CUSTOM_RVA
> +config BR2_RISCV_ISA_RVA
> bool "Atomic Instructions (A)"
> - select BR2_RISCV_ISA_RVA
>
> -config BR2_RISCV_ISA_CUSTOM_RVF
> +config BR2_RISCV_ISA_RVF
> bool "Single-precision Floating-point (F)"
> - select BR2_RISCV_ISA_RVF
>
> -config BR2_RISCV_ISA_CUSTOM_RVD
> +config BR2_RISCV_ISA_RVD
> bool "Double-precision Floating-point (D)"
> depends on BR2_RISCV_ISA_RVF
> - select BR2_RISCV_ISA_RVD
>
> -config BR2_RISCV_ISA_CUSTOM_RVC
> +config BR2_RISCV_ISA_RVC
> bool "Compressed Instructions (C)"
> - select BR2_RISCV_ISA_RVC
>
> -config BR2_RISCV_ISA_CUSTOM_RVV
> +config BR2_RISCV_ISA_RVV
> bool "Vector Instructions (V)"
> - select BR2_RISCV_ISA_RVV
> select BR2_ARCH_NEEDS_GCC_AT_LEAST_12
>
> -endif
> -
> choice
> prompt "Target Architecture Size"
> default BR2_RISCV_64
>
> Thomas?
Not quite, because we want the IMAFD options to remain under the
"custom" option.
Essentially what happens today is:
- RISC-V G implies IMAFD, but there is no way to say I have G + C + V
- RISC-V custom allows any combination of IMAFDCV
What we want is:
- RISC-V G implies IMAFD, but also allows to select C and V
- RISC-V custom allows any combination of IMAFDCV
So something like this:
diff --git a/arch/Config.in.riscv b/arch/Config.in.riscv
index 3dfbb4165f..df8499c7a0 100644
--- a/arch/Config.in.riscv
+++ b/arch/Config.in.riscv
@@ -41,10 +41,10 @@ config BR2_riscv_custom
endchoice
-if BR2_riscv_custom
-
comment "Instruction Set Extensions"
+if BR2_riscv_custom
+
config BR2_RISCV_ISA_CUSTOM_RVM
bool "Integer Multiplication and Division (M)"
select BR2_RISCV_ISA_RVM
@@ -62,6 +62,8 @@ config BR2_RISCV_ISA_CUSTOM_RVD
depends on BR2_RISCV_ISA_RVF
select BR2_RISCV_ISA_RVD
+endif
+
config BR2_RISCV_ISA_CUSTOM_RVC
bool "Compressed Instructions (C)"
select BR2_RISCV_ISA_RVC
@@ -71,8 +73,6 @@ config BR2_RISCV_ISA_CUSTOM_RVV
select BR2_RISCV_ISA_RVV
select BR2_ARCH_NEEDS_GCC_AT_LEAST_12
-endif
-
choice
prompt "Target Architecture Size"
default BR2_RISCV_64
Note that indeed the blind options BR2_RISCV_ISA_RVC and
BR2_RISCV_ISA_RVV are no longer very useful, but I guess I would keep
them anyway to keep the symmetry with BR2_RISCV_ISA_RV{I,M,A,F,D} blind
options.
Thoughts?
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training
https://bootlin.com
More information about the buildroot
mailing list