[Buildroot] [Bug 13751] New: libopenssl (static): huge drop in performance in newer versions of buildroot
bugzilla at busybox.net
bugzilla at busybox.net
Mon Apr 12 09:23:15 UTC 2021
https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=13751
Bug ID: 13751
Summary: libopenssl (static): huge drop in performance in newer
versions of buildroot
Product: buildroot
Version: 2021.02.1
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Other
Assignee: unassigned at buildroot.uclibc.org
Reporter: maksis33 at gmail.com
CC: buildroot at uclibc.org
Target Milestone: ---
I've done some benchmarking with different TLS 1.3 ciphers with an Intel
Celeron N3150 CPU that has support for the AES-NI instruction set. I used
static builds of AirDC++ Web Client (http://airdcpp-web.github.io) that were
built with different versions of buildroot. Target architecture is x86_64
(nocona). Transfer speeds are limited by the CPU (one core is maxed out).
Encrypted download speeds (Buildroot 2021.02.1):
TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256: 27 MB/s
TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384: 24 MB/s
TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256: 41 MB/s
Encrypted download speeds (Buildroot 2019.02):
TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256: 62 MB/s
TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384: 59 MB/s
TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256: 54 MB/s
Note that those are actual network file transfers with additional overhead, so
the plain decrypt speed difference should be much bigger than that ("openssl
speed -evp aes-128-cbc" is about 5x faster than "openssl speed aes-128-cbc" on
the same system).
I'd assume that the issue has something to do with
http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2019-October/263030.html as the
OpenSSL target arch is "gcc no-asm" in Buildroot 2021.02.1 while 2019.02
targets "linux-x86_64" and also has various *_ASM flags present in the
Makefile. I also confirmed with objdump that the binary built with 2021.02.1 is
missing all references to aesenc/aesdec/other AES-NI instructions while those
instructions are present in the binary built with 2019.02.
I read
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/87bea6550ae0dda7c40937cff2e86cc2b0b09491
and https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/9839 but I don't fully understand
why the target architecture was changed. I'd say that ASM support is a must for
applications similar to AirDC++.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the buildroot
mailing list