[Buildroot] [PATCH v2, 1/1] package/libopenssl: set no-asm for static builds

[Fabrice Fontaine]

Le mer. 16 oct. 2019 à 21:07, Thomas Petazzoni
<thomas.petazzoni at bootlin.com> a écrit :
>
> On Wed, 16 Oct 2019 19:10:26 +0200
> Fabrice Fontaine <fontaine.fabrice at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Use no-asm when building statically with a generic architecture such as
> > gcc, see
> >
> > This will fix a static build failure on x86_64 due to the removal of
> > x86/x86_64 BSAES and AES_ASM support by
> > https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/87bea6550ae0dda7c40937cff2e86cc2b0b09491
> >
> > Fixes:
> >  - http://autobuild.buildroot.org/results/e4f04bb13ec1b82b73db645bea4933e52bca4185
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Fabrice Fontaine <fontaine.fabrice at gmail.com>
>
> I am still confused, because the github issue says that no-asm should
> be used whenever linux-generic{32,64} is used, not just for static
> linking scenarios. Am I missing something ?
Indeed, I missed that we're setting linux-generic32 by default. I'll
set no-asm for this one. The other architectures such as linux-x86_64
are not generic.
>
> Thomas
> --
> Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin
> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> https://bootlin.com
Best Regards,

Fabrice