[Buildroot] [PATCH v2] linux-firmware: bump version to latest 1baa348

[Yann E. MORIN]

Thomas, All,

On 2018-11-13 21:02 +0100, Thomas Petazzoni spake thusly:
> On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 18:20:57 +0100, Marcin Niestrój wrote:
[--SNIP--]
> > I think the overall conclusion is that a host-gzip package is needed,
> > just like host-tar. In the meantime I will send v3 of this patch with
> > proper hash (the same as you calculated above).
> 
> This is getting really horrible.
> 
> On my side, I have updated to Fedora 29, which ships tar 1.30, that we
> consider as broken, and therefore now for everything single small build
> that I do, I'm paying the price of building tar, which is super
> annoying. This is especially annoying as tar 1.30 is only problematic
> when *creating* tarballs of git-fetched packages, which clearly does
> not happen at every build.

Well, we only need host-tar and host-gzip when creating tarballs, not
extracting them, correct? So, we could very well envision the fact that
host-tar (and host-gzip) are only added to FOO_DOWNLOAD dependecies when
FOO_SITE_METHOD == git (and they are needed, of course), no?

(note: tar is ugly, because its configure step takes ~26s, while the
build is only ~4s).

> It would be truly horrible to also have to build our own gzip. Maybe we
> need to somehow revisit our requirement that we need to have
> reproducible tarballs for git-fetched packages ?

I am ready to pay the price for reproducibility any time.

Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.

-- 
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
|  Yann E. MORIN  | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software  Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN     |  ___               |
| +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------:  X  AGAINST      |  \e/  There is no  |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL    |   v   conspiracy.  |
'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'