[Buildroot] [PATCH] systemd: add an option to use busybox's getty

Jérémy Rosen jeremy.rosen at smile.fr
Tue Jul 10 15:17:40 UTC 2018



On 10/07/2018 11:12, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:
>
> On 10-07-18 10:05, Jérémy Rosen wrote:
>>
>> On 10/07/2018 00:21, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:
>>> On 09-07-18 10:02, Romain Naour wrote:
>>>> Hi Jeremy,
>>>>
>>>> Le 08/07/2018 à 21:54, Jérémy Rosen a écrit :
>>>>> Currently, the patch to replace agetty with busybox's getty is always
>>>>> applied.
>>>>>
>>>>> this patch adds a compile-time option to systemd to choose either agetty
>>>>> or busybox's getty and chooses the correct option depending on agetty being
>>>>> selected in busybox
>>>>>
>>>> As discussed privately, if you want an example on how apply a patch
>>>> conditionally you can take a look at the gcc package [1].
>>>   I don't think we want to apply patches conditionally. In fact, Jérémy's change
>>> is much better, because it makes the patch upstreamable.
>> systemd upstream is not interested in supporting busybox AFAIU...
>   Really? There are a few commits in systemd that mention support for busybox...
>
>   I do believe that Denys (the busybox maintainer) at some point made some
> negative comments about adding support for systemd (I guess about communicating
> with journald). I don't remember ever seeing systemd people saying anything
> about busybox. But I'm not really following the systemd world.
>
That was my understanding, but I can submit a PR, we'll see if they are 
interested...

>>>   That said, as discussed on IRC, a much easier approach would be to overwrite
>>> systemd's getty unit files with custom buildroot unit files in case
>>> UTIL_LINUX_AGETTY is not selected. Then the patch could be dropped entirely.
>> The patch approch has the advantage of "breaking" if upstream changes, but I can
>> do a followup in that direction, if that's what the project wants...
>   Good point. My first thought was: nothing important is ever going to change in
> those getty files. But then again, it has some things that might change, like
> dependencies and conditions.
>
>   So yes, the patch is probably the better approach. Could you make an attempt at
> upstreaming it though?
will do (not right away, i'm away for a week)

>
>   One comment on that patch, though: the changequote using a non-7-bit-ascii
> character is pretty ugly IMO, and also the characters you choose are not a
> typical open-close pair. Could you replace it with [] or {} or suchlike?
I'll try to find a pair that is not used in the block I quote :)
>
>   Also, I think (but I'm no m4 expert) you can make it a bit more readable by doing:
>
> {m4_dnl
> # The '-o' option ...
>
> instead of
>
> {# The '-o' option ...
>
>   Come to think of it, isn't it sufficient to just double-quote instead of doing
> changequote? So
>
> m4_ifdef(`ENABLE_BUSYBOX_GETTY',
> ``ExecStart=-/sbin/getty -L %I 115200 vt100'',
> ``m4_dnl
> # The '-o' option value tells agetty to replace 'login' arguments with an
> ...
> '')m4_dnl
Ok, your m4-fu is way better than mine... i'll have a look at that too.

Thx for the review

Jérémy
>
>   Regards,
>   Arnout
>
>
>>>   Regards,
>>>   Arnout
>>>
>>>> This has been introduced by [2] but there is some other place where
>>>> $(APPLY_PATCHES) is used (conditionally or unconditionally).
>>>>
>>>> $(APPLY_PATCHES) is defined in package/Makefile.in but this way to use it is not
>>>> documented in the manual [3].
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Romain
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://git.busybox.net/buildroot/tree/package/gcc/gcc.mk#n41
>>>> [2]
>>>> https://git.busybox.net/buildroot/commit/?id=197006a41c1a0450bf6350d5742e186b5b0c69de
>>>> [3] http://nightly.buildroot.org/manual.html#patch-policy
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> buildroot mailing list
>>>> buildroot at busybox.net
>>>> http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
>>>>
>> -- 
>> SMILE <http://www.smile.eu/>
>>
>> 20 rue des Jardins
>> 92600 Asnières-sur-Seine
>>
>> 	
>> *Jérémy ROSEN*
>> Architecte technique
>> Responsable de l'expertise Smile-ECS
>>
>> email jeremy.rosen at smile.fr <mailto:jeremy.rosen at smile.fr>
>> phone +33141402967
>> url http://www.smile.eu
>>
>> Twitter <https://twitter.com/GroupeSmile> Facebook
>> <https://www.facebook.com/smileopensource> LinkedIn
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/smile> Github <https://github.com/Smile-SA>
>>
>>
>> Découvrez l’univers Smile, rendez-vous sur smile.eu
>> <http://smile.eu/?utm_source=signature&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=signature>
>>
>> eco Pour la planète, n'imprimez ce mail que si c'est nécessaire

-- 
SMILE <http://www.smile.eu/>

20 rue des Jardins
92600 Asnières-sur-Seine

	
*Jérémy ROSEN*
Architecte technique
Responsable de l'expertise Smile-ECS

email jeremy.rosen at smile.fr <mailto:jeremy.rosen at smile.fr>
phone +33141402967
url http://www.smile.eu

Twitter <https://twitter.com/GroupeSmile> Facebook 
<https://www.facebook.com/smileopensource> LinkedIn 
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/smile> Github 
<https://github.com/Smile-SA>


Découvrez l’univers Smile, rendez-vous sur smile.eu 
<http://smile.eu/?utm_source=signature&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=signature>

eco Pour la planète, n'imprimez ce mail que si c'est nécessaire
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.buildroot.org/pipermail/buildroot/attachments/20180710/7d0cafe3/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the buildroot mailing list