[Buildroot] [PATCH] x264: needs mmu

[Peter Korsgaard]

>>>>> "Gustavo" == Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo at zacarias.com.ar> writes:

 > On 02/05/16 12:23, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
 >> Hmm, is that really generally true? I don't quite see why you cannot
 >> have madvise() without mmu. Looking at uClibc-ng, the option enabling
 >> madvise support doesn't depend on MMU support.

 > I've based the rule on previous 80b9dfce, 5b309e1a and 8d446718
 > scenarios and didn't investigate myself.

Ok - Thomas, do you know if madvise generally isn't available or if it
is something specific to the binary bfin toolchain?

I'll kick off a build with our new stm32f defconfig and look.

-- 
Venlig hilsen,
Peter Korsgaard