[Buildroot] [PATCH] binutils: bump 2.25.x series to 2.25.1

[Gustavo Zacarias]

On 22/07/15 11:48, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:

> I know we haven't been doing this so far, but should we name the option
> 2_25_X like we do for gcc, and therefore avoid renaming the option for
> every minor release ? Or keep it named 2_25 even if the version is
> 2.25.1, I don't really care.

Same dilemma here, though i preferred to skip the rename in the bump.
I can send a follow up patch to do the renaming, it seems fit to match 
gcc i suppose.
Regards.